• Home
  • Contact
Money By Mark – Big Dogs

Posts Tagged ‘Chase’

May 06

How to double your money – slowly.

Comments Off

That’s right – slowly. Everyone else talks about making money fast and other get rich quick schemes; therefore, I thought I would shed light on making money from a different perspective.

From my article, Radio GaGa, I mentioned I would bring up another ad relating to money.

Whether the ad is for a loan, bank or beer commercial, ads need to convey a message and get people to act or perform – such as send money here versus going there so to speak.

Advertising can be fun. Advertising can be manipulative. Advertising sometimes needs to be short and sweet, or quick to read.

Take the following ad – Save More, Think Less – I saw at Bank of America.

It’s a catchy ad, or slogan. Either way, the idea is to put the phrase in our head and get us to remember the particular company.

I don’t have a problem with BoA, I don’t bank there, but none the less, their sign can apply to any bank. As a matter of fact, Chase Bank has an ad talking about saving is the new spending (or something to that effect). Both banks, and others for that matter, want people to save money, i.e. make deposits. No big deal, yet. I’ll explain in just a minute.

Saving money, or setting money aside is a smart thing to do. However, the problem I see comes in the “think less” category.

Making money requires a little more knowledge and effort.

I’ve written articles, and chapters, on money. Take renting stocks for example. The concept is very easy, but you can’t just think less when dealing with options and investments.

Putting money in a savings account only requires a simple action, yet can be very costly.

Take into account those deposits I said I would talk about.

If you put $25,000 in a CD for 5 years at 3% (if you can get that right now), you would have $28,981 in five years which is a gain of $3,981 or an average of $796 per year.

That’s not a lot of money when you consider inflation and taxes. And, $25,000 is a fairly large deposit for many people.

(Even if you think we might be in a period of deflation, what are car prices for a Toyota Camry today versus 1990? Higher. What will typically happen in the future. Higher prices.)

To put this in a different perspective and using the Rule of 72, at 3% interest, your money would take 24 years to double. At 1% which might be on short term CD’s, your money would double in 72 years!

Therefore, if you want to think less, go ahead and let the bank use your deposits to make the big money, but don’t complain when they do… you and I have the opportunity to save more and think more as well.

Share
Tags: Bank of America, Chase, Money      Posted in: bank, Money       Comments Off
Dec 04

Do They Get It?

Comments Off

Who are they?  Business and government.

Businesses such as Capital One and Bank of America seem to be getting the idea.  The idea is that having government run your business is not a good idea.

This week Bank of America issued stock to raise cash to repay the bailout money, which was apparently a shock.  My first thought was who is shocked?  Then it dawned on me that the people shocked may be the people pushing for nationalizing everything and are in favor of socialism and hate the ones who profit.

Today, Capital One paid the Treasury $146.5 million dollars to buy back the warrants the government controlled.  Warrants are very similar to options.  These warrants give the holder, which is the U.S. government, the ability to convert the contracts to ownership in companies.

Capital One, as did others, received money from the bailout, but issued warrants as well to the government.  Now, they are buying them back.

JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs have also gotten away from the government as a potential owner and a hinder to business by repaying loans.  Is this just due to salary restrictions?  To some degree, but not entirely I’m sure.  Obama painted a target on CEO’s, but at the same time his actions reduces incentives for people and businesses to excel as well as created class warfare.

Government help is just the tip of the iceberg.  What’s below the water contains all of the restrictions and conditions placed on business and people that take away freedoms.  These are the “strings attached”.

Businesses, as well as many people, do not want government running their activities and lives.  Sure, assistance is necessary and helpful, but at the same time the government attaches too many strings.  I know of a company that when they saw the warrants attached to the grant money, the owners said “no way”.

When these banks, or any business for that matter, use the cash they have plus dividends to pay off loans, these businesses must be doing something right.

However, who doesn’t seem to get it is the people running the government.

Many banks for example, are not needing the financial help from the government now.  However, Nancy Pelosi wants to continue the old “tax & spend” way of doing things.

Within the TARP money program, funds exist that have not been used.  Great.  There is no reason to continually put a burden on the taxpayers to spend money not needed.  In the provision, repaid money has to go towards the balance and Congress can’t simply spend the money.  However, Nancy Pelosi and others apparently do not like the idea of paying off loans.  (These would be loans to the taxpayers and other countries).

As far as creating jobs, the spenders of other people’s money party wants to use the TARP money for job creation and included labor groups in the job creation forums.

Where these people in Washington do not get it, is labor and employment is a result of profitable business (except for government agencies that do not have to create a profit).  They should start with the owners, entrepreneurs, investors, etc. who create jobs – first, and cut taxes.  Obama doesn’t get it or he would have had the plan explained during his campaign instead of trying to figure things out now.  Remember when unemployment wasn’t to go above 8%?  Now it’s over 10%!

It seems like it is a constant game of cat and mouse.  Who gets it?  We will see in 2010′s elections as well as how the economy turns out down the road.

But in reality, government should be there to help, not control.  Everyone could be better off when Big Brother gets out of the way.  That I get.

Share
Tags: bank, business, Capital One, CEO, Chase, Goldman Sachs, government, JP Morgan, Money, Obama, Options, warrants      Posted in: bank, Business       Comments Off

   

Money By Mark – Big Dogs is proudly powered by WordPress | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).
Design by Autobazar & Free WordPress Themes
Ultimate Jobs, Cars and Windows Cloud Hosting by AccuWebHosting.Com